Boxicons is a solid choice — 3,389 icons, MIT licensed. But it is not the only one, and it is not the best fit for every project. Below are 8 open-source alternatives ranked by how directly they answer the reasons people look for a replacement: more coverage, more visual range, or a simpler license.
| Library | Icons | Variants | License | React package | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remix Icon | 3,244 | line and fill | Apache 2.0 | remixicon |
vs Boxicons |
| Ionicons | 2,607 | outline, filled and sharp | MIT | ionicons |
vs Boxicons |
| Tabler Icons | 6,324 | outline only | MIT | @tabler/icons-react |
vs Boxicons |
| Eva Icons | 490 | fill and outline | MIT | eva-icons |
vs Boxicons |
| Lucide Icons | 1,979 | outline only | ISC | lucide-react |
vs Boxicons |
| Heroicons | 1,297 | outline and solid | MIT | @heroicons/react |
vs Boxicons |
| Phosphor Icons | 9,198 | thin, light, regular, bold, fill and duotone | MIT | phosphor-react |
vs Boxicons |
| Feather Icons | 286 | outline only | MIT | react-feather |
vs Boxicons |
Websites and apps that need UI icons and brand logos from one package — particularly portfolios, link-in-bio pages, tech stack sections, and footers.
For pure brand logos with a cleaner license, Simple Icons is CC0 and has 3,714 marks. For UI icons alone, Remix Icon and Tabler are more consistent.
Start from the constraint that actually binds your project. If it is coverage, sort by icon count — the difference between a 286-icon set and a 20,000-icon set is whether you ever have to design a glyph yourself. If it is visual range, look at variants per concept: a library with six weights lets you build hierarchy without a second dependency. If it is legal simplicity, avoid CC BY sets where attribution is impractical.
All of these libraries are indexed on IconStash, so you can search one concept and compare how every set drew it before committing.
The usual reasons are coverage, style range and licensing. Boxicons ships 3,389 icons in regular, solid and logos. If you need concepts it does not cover, or several visual weights from one set, or a license without attribution, one of the alternatives below will fit better.
Every library listed here is open source and free for commercial use. Most are MIT, ISC or Apache 2.0, none of which require attribution. The exception in this list is any CC BY 4.0 set, which does require a visible credit — check the license column in the table above before committing.
Technically yes, but mixing sets usually looks inconsistent because each one draws to its own grid and stroke weight. If you need to fill a gap, prefer pulling a single icon and redrawing it to match your primary set.