Lucide Icons and Phosphor Icons are two of the most widely used
open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly
reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two
side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.
The short answer
Phosphor Icons is the broader set: 9,198 icons against 1,979 in Lucide Icons — roughly 365% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
Phosphor Icons gives you more visual range: 6 variants per concept (thin, light, regular, bold, fill and duotone), where Lucide Icons ships 1.
Both are ISC, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.
Specifications compared
Specification comparison
Lucide Icons
Phosphor Icons
Icons
1,979
9,198
Visual variants per concept
1 — outline only
6 — thin, light, regular, bold, fill and duotone
Design grid
24×24
24×24
License
ISC
MIT
Attribution required
No
No
Official React package
lucide-react
phosphor-react
Same icons, both libraries
Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the
part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and
optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.
Lucide IconsPhosphor Icons
—
home
search
—
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
—
mail
calendar
Which one should you choose?
Pick Lucide Icons when
SaaS dashboards, developer tools, documentation sites, and any product that wants a calm, neutral, geometric icon language. Lucide is particularly strong in dense interfaces because its uniform stroke weight stays legible at 16px and 20px.
Consider otherwise if: If you need multiple weights from one library, Phosphor offers six. If you need filled icons, IconPark Solid or Material Design Icons are better choices, since Lucide is outline-only.
Pick Phosphor Icons when
Design systems, products with strong visual hierarchy, and teams that want one library to cover every context. The weight range also solves the common problem of outline icons disappearing on coloured or photographic backgrounds.
Consider otherwise if: If you only need one weight, the six-weight structure is overhead you will not use — Lucide or Tabler are simpler. If you want duotone plus a premium aesthetic, compare Solar and Huge Icons.
Coverage
Lucide Icons contains 1,979 icons and Phosphor Icons contains 9,198.
Lucide began as a fork of Feather Icons when Feather's release cadence slowed and community pull requests began to pile up. Rather than let the project stall, contributors created Lucide with an explicit commitment to community governance and regular releases. It has since grown well past its parent: 1,979 icons against Feather's 286.
Phosphor is built around a single idea: one icon family that works at every weight. Each of its 9,198 icons is available in six weights — Thin, Light, Regular, Bold, Fill, and Duotone — so you can express hierarchy, hover state, and emphasis without ever leaving the library.
Licensing
Lucide Icons is released under ISC.
Functionally equivalent to MIT — no attribution required.
Phosphor Icons is released under MIT.
Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.
Using them from IconStash
You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept
once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with
Lucide Icons or
Phosphor Icons, or browse
every library comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lucide or Phosphor better for React projects?
Both have first-party React packages: lucide-react and phosphor-react. Lucide has the smaller catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.
Which has more icons, Lucide or Phosphor?
Lucide Icons has 1,979 icons and Phosphor Icons has 9,198. Phosphor Icons is larger by about 365%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.
Can I mix Lucide and Phosphor in one interface?
You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Lucide uses 24×24 and Phosphor uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.
What licenses do Lucide and Phosphor use?
Lucide Icons is ISC: Functionally equivalent to MIT — no attribution required. Phosphor Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.
Do Lucide and Phosphor include filled and outline versions?
Lucide Icons offers outline only; Phosphor Icons offers thin, light, regular, bold, fill and duotone. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.
Which is better for small sizes like 16px?
At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Lucide draws on a 24×24 grid and Phosphor on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.