Tabler Icons and Material Symbols are two of the most widely used
open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly
reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two
side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.
The short answer
Material Symbols is the broader set: 18,547 icons against 6,324 in Tabler Icons — roughly 193% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
Material Symbols gives you more visual range: 4 variants per concept (variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes), where Tabler Icons ships 1.
Both are MIT, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.
Specifications compared
Specification comparison
Tabler Icons
Material Symbols
Icons
6,324
18,547
Visual variants per concept
1 — outline only
4 — variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes
Design grid
24×24
24×24
License
MIT
Apache 2.0
Attribution required
No
No
Official React package
@tabler/icons-react
@material-symbols/svg-400
Same icons, both libraries
Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the
part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and
optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.
Tabler IconsMaterial Symbols
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
—
bell
mail
calendar
Which one should you choose?
Pick Tabler Icons when
Admin panels, internal tools, and data-heavy B2B products where you need an unusual icon and don't want to draw it yourself. Tabler's breadth means you are rarely forced to mix libraries to fill a gap.
Consider otherwise if: If you want a smaller, more opinionated set with tighter visual consistency, Lucide or Feather are easier to keep coherent. For multiple weights in one library, look at Phosphor.
Pick Material Symbols when
Products that want continuous control over icon weight and fill state, and teams that would rather ship one font file than manage five icon sets.
Consider otherwise if: If you need individually imported SVG components with tree-shaking, the older Material Icons set or Lucide is a better fit — a variable font loads all 18,547 glyphs even if you use thirty of them.
Coverage
Tabler Icons contains 6,324 icons and Material Symbols contains 18,547.
Tabler Icons is maintained alongside the Tabler admin dashboard template, and it shows: the set is built for real application chrome rather than marketing pages. With 6,324 icons it is one of the largest MIT-licensed outline libraries available, and every icon is drawn on a consistent 24×24 grid with a 2px stroke.
Material Symbols is Google's current icon format and the successor to Material Icons. It is built on variable font technology: all 18,547 icons live in a single font file, and four axes — Weight, Fill, Grade, and Optical Size — can be adjusted continuously rather than by swapping between five static themes.
Licensing
Tabler Icons is released under MIT.
Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.
Material Symbols is released under Apache 2.0.
No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.
Using them from IconStash
You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept
once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with
Tabler Icons or
Material Symbols, or browse
every library comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Tabler or Material Symbols better for React projects?
Both have first-party React packages: @tabler/icons-react and @material-symbols/svg-400. Tabler has the smaller catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.
Which has more icons, Tabler or Material Symbols?
Tabler Icons has 6,324 icons and Material Symbols has 18,547. Material Symbols is larger by about 193%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.
Can I mix Tabler and Material Symbols in one interface?
You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Tabler uses 24×24 and Material Symbols uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.
What licenses do Tabler and Material Symbols use?
Tabler Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Material Symbols is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.
Do Tabler and Material Symbols include filled and outline versions?
Tabler Icons offers outline only; Material Symbols offers variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.
Which is better for small sizes like 16px?
At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Tabler draws on a 24×24 grid and Material Symbols on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.