Icons

Material vs Ionicons

Material Design Icons and Ionicons are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Material Design Icons is the broader set: 14,001 icons against 2,607 in Ionicons — roughly 437% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
  • Material Design Icons gives you more visual range: 5 variants per concept (outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled), where Ionicons ships 3.
  • Both are Apache 2.0, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Material Design IconsIonicons
Icons14,0012,607
Visual variants per concept5 — outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled3 — outline, filled and sharp
Design grid24×2424×24
LicenseApache 2.0MIT
Attribution requiredNoNo
Official React package@mui/icons-materialionicons

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Material Design IconsIonicons 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Material Design Icons when

Products that follow Material Design, Android-adjacent apps, and any interface where recognition matters more than distinctiveness. If your users already use Gmail, Drive, or Android, these icons need no explanation.

Consider otherwise if: Google's newer Material Symbols supersedes this set with variable-font icons in a single file. For a less Google-flavoured look, Fluent UI and Carbon are the enterprise equivalents.

Pick Ionicons when

Mobile and hybrid apps, cross-platform products, and interfaces that want three clear icon variants from one consistent source.

Consider otherwise if: For a more modern, minimal aesthetic, Lucide and Heroicons are the current defaults. Material Design Icons offers five themes if you need more range.

Coverage

Material Design Icons contains 14,001 icons and Ionicons contains 2,607. Material Design Icons is Google's official icon set, and it is the most widely deployed icon vocabulary on the web. The 14,001 icons follow the Material geometry rules — a 24×24 grid with 2px keypoint padding, straight edges softened by corner radii, and a deliberate, slightly geometric construction.

Ionicons was built for the Ionic Framework and has been refined since 2013, which makes it one of the longest-maintained icon sets here. The 2,607 icons ship in three variants — Outline, Filled, and Sharp — each drawn on a 24×24 grid.

Licensing

Material Design Icons is released under Apache 2.0. No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.

Ionicons is released under MIT. Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Material Design Icons or Ionicons, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Material or Ionicons better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: @mui/icons-material and ionicons. Material has the larger catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Material or Ionicons?

Material Design Icons has 14,001 icons and Ionicons has 2,607. Material Design Icons is larger by about 437%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Material and Ionicons in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Material uses 24×24 and Ionicons uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Material and Ionicons use?

Material Design Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Ionicons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Material and Ionicons include filled and outline versions?

Material Design Icons offers outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled; Ionicons offers outline, filled and sharp. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Material draws on a 24×24 grid and Ionicons on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.