Icons

Material vs Material Symbols

Material Design Icons and Material Symbols are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Material Symbols is the broader set: 18,547 icons against 14,001 in Material Design Icons — roughly 32% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
  • Material Design Icons gives you more visual range: 5 variants per concept (outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled), where Material Symbols ships 4.
  • Both are Apache 2.0, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Material Design IconsMaterial Symbols
Icons14,00118,547
Visual variants per concept5 — outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled4 — variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes
Design grid24×2424×24
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Attribution requiredNoNo
Official React package@mui/icons-material@material-symbols/svg-400

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Material Design IconsMaterial Symbols 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Material Design Icons when

Products that follow Material Design, Android-adjacent apps, and any interface where recognition matters more than distinctiveness. If your users already use Gmail, Drive, or Android, these icons need no explanation.

Consider otherwise if: Google's newer Material Symbols supersedes this set with variable-font icons in a single file. For a less Google-flavoured look, Fluent UI and Carbon are the enterprise equivalents.

Pick Material Symbols when

Products that want continuous control over icon weight and fill state, and teams that would rather ship one font file than manage five icon sets.

Consider otherwise if: If you need individually imported SVG components with tree-shaking, the older Material Icons set or Lucide is a better fit — a variable font loads all 18,547 glyphs even if you use thirty of them.

Coverage

Material Design Icons contains 14,001 icons and Material Symbols contains 18,547. Material Design Icons is Google's official icon set, and it is the most widely deployed icon vocabulary on the web. The 14,001 icons follow the Material geometry rules — a 24×24 grid with 2px keypoint padding, straight edges softened by corner radii, and a deliberate, slightly geometric construction.

Material Symbols is Google's current icon format and the successor to Material Icons. It is built on variable font technology: all 18,547 icons live in a single font file, and four axes — Weight, Fill, Grade, and Optical Size — can be adjusted continuously rather than by swapping between five static themes.

Licensing

Material Design Icons is released under Apache 2.0. No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.

Material Symbols is released under Apache 2.0. No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Material Design Icons or Material Symbols, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Material or Material Symbols better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: @mui/icons-material and @material-symbols/svg-400. Material has the smaller catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Material or Material Symbols?

Material Design Icons has 14,001 icons and Material Symbols has 18,547. Material Symbols is larger by about 32%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Material and Material Symbols in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Material uses 24×24 and Material Symbols uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Material and Material Symbols use?

Material Design Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Material Symbols is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Material and Material Symbols include filled and outline versions?

Material Design Icons offers outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled; Material Symbols offers variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Material draws on a 24×24 grid and Material Symbols on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.