Icons

Feather vs Material

Feather Icons and Material Design Icons are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Material Design Icons is the broader set: 14,001 icons against 286 in Feather Icons — roughly 4795% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
  • Material Design Icons gives you more visual range: 5 variants per concept (outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled), where Feather Icons ships 1.
  • Both are MIT, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Feather IconsMaterial Design Icons
Icons28614,001
Visual variants per concept1 — outline only5 — outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled
Design grid24×2424×24
LicenseMITApache 2.0
Attribution requiredNoNo
Official React packagereact-feather@mui/icons-material

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Feather IconsMaterial Design Icons 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Feather Icons when

Landing pages, portfolios, marketing sites, and small apps where you need perhaps thirty icons and want them to look calm and deliberate. Feather is also a good teaching reference for icon grid discipline.

Consider otherwise if: For an actively maintained superset with the same aesthetic, use Lucide — it began as a Feather fork and now has 1,979 icons. Iconoir is another minimalist option with far more coverage.

Pick Material Design Icons when

Products that follow Material Design, Android-adjacent apps, and any interface where recognition matters more than distinctiveness. If your users already use Gmail, Drive, or Android, these icons need no explanation.

Consider otherwise if: Google's newer Material Symbols supersedes this set with variable-font icons in a single file. For a less Google-flavoured look, Fluent UI and Carbon are the enterprise equivalents.

Coverage

Feather Icons contains 286 icons and Material Design Icons contains 14,001. Feather Icons is the library that defined the modern minimal outline icon. Created by Cole Bemis in 2017, its 286 icons are drawn on a 24×24 grid with a 2px stroke, rounded joins, and no fill — a formula that an entire generation of icon libraries has since copied.

Material Design Icons is Google's official icon set, and it is the most widely deployed icon vocabulary on the web. The 14,001 icons follow the Material geometry rules — a 24×24 grid with 2px keypoint padding, straight edges softened by corner radii, and a deliberate, slightly geometric construction.

Licensing

Feather Icons is released under MIT. Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.

Material Design Icons is released under Apache 2.0. No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Feather Icons or Material Design Icons, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Feather or Material better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: react-feather and @mui/icons-material. Feather has the smaller catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Feather or Material?

Feather Icons has 286 icons and Material Design Icons has 14,001. Material Design Icons is larger by about 4795%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Feather and Material in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Feather uses 24×24 and Material uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Feather and Material use?

Feather Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Material Design Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Feather and Material include filled and outline versions?

Feather Icons offers outline only; Material Design Icons offers outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Feather draws on a 24×24 grid and Material on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.