Lucide Icons and Material Design Icons are two of the most widely used
open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly
reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two
side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.
The short answer
Material Design Icons is the broader set: 14,001 icons against 1,979 in Lucide Icons — roughly 607% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
Material Design Icons gives you more visual range: 5 variants per concept (outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled), where Lucide Icons ships 1.
Both are ISC, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.
Specifications compared
Specification comparison
Lucide Icons
Material Design Icons
Icons
1,979
14,001
Visual variants per concept
1 — outline only
5 — outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled
Design grid
24×24
24×24
License
ISC
Apache 2.0
Attribution required
No
No
Official React package
lucide-react
@mui/icons-material
Same icons, both libraries
Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the
part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and
optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.
Lucide IconsMaterial Design Icons
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar
Which one should you choose?
Pick Lucide Icons when
SaaS dashboards, developer tools, documentation sites, and any product that wants a calm, neutral, geometric icon language. Lucide is particularly strong in dense interfaces because its uniform stroke weight stays legible at 16px and 20px.
Consider otherwise if: If you need multiple weights from one library, Phosphor offers six. If you need filled icons, IconPark Solid or Material Design Icons are better choices, since Lucide is outline-only.
Pick Material Design Icons when
Products that follow Material Design, Android-adjacent apps, and any interface where recognition matters more than distinctiveness. If your users already use Gmail, Drive, or Android, these icons need no explanation.
Consider otherwise if: Google's newer Material Symbols supersedes this set with variable-font icons in a single file. For a less Google-flavoured look, Fluent UI and Carbon are the enterprise equivalents.
Coverage
Lucide Icons contains 1,979 icons and Material Design Icons contains 14,001.
Lucide began as a fork of Feather Icons when Feather's release cadence slowed and community pull requests began to pile up. Rather than let the project stall, contributors created Lucide with an explicit commitment to community governance and regular releases. It has since grown well past its parent: 1,979 icons against Feather's 286.
Material Design Icons is Google's official icon set, and it is the most widely deployed icon vocabulary on the web. The 14,001 icons follow the Material geometry rules — a 24×24 grid with 2px keypoint padding, straight edges softened by corner radii, and a deliberate, slightly geometric construction.
Licensing
Lucide Icons is released under ISC.
Functionally equivalent to MIT — no attribution required.
Material Design Icons is released under Apache 2.0.
No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.
Using them from IconStash
You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept
once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with
Lucide Icons or
Material Design Icons, or browse
every library comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lucide or Material better for React projects?
Both have first-party React packages: lucide-react and @mui/icons-material. Lucide has the smaller catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.
Which has more icons, Lucide or Material?
Lucide Icons has 1,979 icons and Material Design Icons has 14,001. Material Design Icons is larger by about 607%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.
Can I mix Lucide and Material in one interface?
You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Lucide uses 24×24 and Material uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.
What licenses do Lucide and Material use?
Lucide Icons is ISC: Functionally equivalent to MIT — no attribution required. Material Design Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.
Do Lucide and Material include filled and outline versions?
Lucide Icons offers outline only; Material Design Icons offers outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.
Which is better for small sizes like 16px?
At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Lucide draws on a 24×24 grid and Material on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.